Case 2403254/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K O’Driscoll v Angelus Law Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2403254/2024
- Decision date
- 27 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K O’Driscoll
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Miss K O’Driscoll against Angelus Law Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £8,733.32.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,582.56. The hearing listed for 8 October 2024 was cancelled.
A separate notice recorded that interest may be payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the sums remain unpaid after 14 days from the relevant decision day. The relevant decision day was stated to be 27 September 2024, with the calculation day 28 September 2024 and the stipulated rate of interest 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £8,733.32 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £8,733 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,582.56 for failure to pay holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,583 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,316
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.