Case 2403275/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Patel v Famevalley Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2403275/2018
- Decision date
- 1 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Humble REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Patel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Manchester on 22 January 2019, Employment Judge Humble refused the respondent's applications to strike out the case for having no reasonable prospect of success and to make a deposit order. The tribunal also refused to strike out the case on the grounds of unreasonable conduct or failure to comply with tribunal orders by the claimant.
The claimant's application to amend the claim so that he could pursue a section 100 unfair dismissal claim was granted, and the amended further and better particulars were admitted in full. The judgment did not determine any substantive liability issue or award any remedy; it records that the case will proceed to a full hearing at which the remaining claims will be decided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant's application to amend the case to pursue a section 100 unfair dismissal claim was granted at this preliminary hearing. The tribunal did not determine the merits of that claim; it directed that the case proceed to a full hearing. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.