Case 2403333/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Tracey v Cedar Tree Pads Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2403333/2024
- Decision date
- 5 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Tracey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Shotter, sitting alone at Liverpool (by CVP) on 5 December 2025, heard the case in the claimant's absence; the respondent was represented by Mr Chaya, owner director. The Tribunal found the holiday pay complaint well-founded, holding that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant in accordance with regulation 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998, and ordered payment of £91.98 net (2.5 days at £36.79 per day net).
The Tribunal further found that at the commencement of proceedings the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. Finding no exceptional circumstances making the minimum two-week award unjust or inequitable, the Tribunal considered it just and equitable to award four weeks' gross pay, and accordingly ordered the respondent to pay £1,128.80 gross under section 38 Employment Act 2002. Payment is to be made within 28 days on provision of bank details.
The complaints of disability discrimination and wrongful dismissal (notice pay) were dismissed on withdrawal. Written reasons were not provided with the judgment, as oral reasons were given at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Well-founded complaint under regulations 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998; ordered sum of £91.98 net (2.5 days @ £36.79 per day net). | Upheld | — | £92 |
| Working time regulations | Same finding as the holiday pay claim; the breach is framed under regs 14(2) and/or 16(1) WTR 1998. Award is not separately split between holiday_pay and working_time headings. | Upheld | — | £92 |
| Other | Breach of duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars; award of four weeks' gross pay under section 38 Employment Act 2002 (£1,128.80 gross). Classified as 'other' as this statutory award does not map to a §4.4 enum value. | Upheld | — | £1,129 |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed on withdrawal per paragraph 4 of the judgment. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Notice pay claim dismissed on withdrawal per paragraph 4 of the judgment. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,221
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- regulation 14(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 16(1) Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.