Case 2403388/2024 · Employment Tribunal
K Bradley v Tibard Laundry Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2403388/2024
- Decision date
- 17 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
K Bradley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the tribunal determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 without a hearing. It found that K Bradley had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment.
The redundancy payment was assessed at £10,699.78, using a weekly pay figure of £411.53 and 18 years' service, applying 1.5 weeks' pay for each full year worked age 41 or over. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,975.44 for 24 untaken days, made up of 16 days carried over from 2022 and 8 days from 2023, at £82.31 per day.
On notice, the tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract. It calculated 12 weeks' statutory notice pay at £4,938.36 gross, deducted half of the universal credit payments received during the notice period (£815.97 divided by 2 = £407.99), and awarded £4,530.37 in damages. The total gross sum awarded was £17,205.59. The written decision also includes the standard interest notice, but it does not quantify a separate interest amount.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and calculated the redundancy payment on 18 years' service at 1.5 weeks' pay for each full year worked age 41 or over. | Upheld | — | £10,700 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement for 16 accrued but untaken days carried over from 2022 and 8 days from 2023. | Upheld | — | £1,975 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages after deducting 50% of universal credit payments received during the notice period. | Upheld | — | £4,530 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,206
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.