Case 2403405/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Mcallister v UK Cargo Logistics Services Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2403405/2022
- Decision date
- 26 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Mcallister
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On that basis, the tribunal made a determination in the claimant's favour without a contested hearing.
The tribunal found that UK Cargo Logistics Services Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay Mr C Mcallister the gross sum of £462.00 in respect of that claim.
The written notice attached to the judgment recorded that the relevant decision day was 26 August 2022, the calculation day was 27 August 2022, and the stipulated rate of interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 was 8% per annum if the award remained unpaid after the 14-day period. No separate interest amount was quantified in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £462.00. | Upheld | — | £462 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £462
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.