Case 2403408/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Thomas v Haskins Associates Ltd FAO Simon Haskins — 2023
- Case reference
- 2403408/2023
- Decision date
- 2 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 3 July 2023, the Tribunal gave Mr Thomas an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated bases were that he had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 9 May 2023 and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that he failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Phil Allen struck out the claim on 26 July 2023. The judgment does not determine the underlying merits of the pleaded claim(s) or record any award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not separately identify this head of claim, but the case listing included breach of contract and the order struck out the claim as a whole. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not separately identify this head of claim, but the case listing included unlawful deduction from wages and the order struck out the claim as a whole. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.