Case 2403422/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Sanderson v Fission Recruitment Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2403422/2020
- Decision date
- 20 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Sanderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Liverpool by CVP on 7 October 2020 before Employment Judge Benson Date, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by its managing director. The written record states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The tribunal held that Mr C Sanderson had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered Fission Recruitment Services Limited to pay damages in the agreed net sum of £545.00.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £270.00. A separate claim of unauthorised deductions from pay, said to relate to commission payments, failed and was dismissed.
The judgment records no separate apportionment of interest or other remedy beyond the two sums awarded, so the bottom-line monetary award on the face of the decision is £815.00.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissal was found to be in breach of contract in respect of notice, and damages were ordered in the agreed net sum of £545.00. | Upheld | — | £545 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £270.00. | Upheld | — | £270 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim of unauthorised deductions from pay in respect of commission payments failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £815
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.