Case 2403430/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Azzouni v Italian Express Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2403430/2020
- Decision date
- 16 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Azzouni
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Phil Allen found that Mr M Azzouni had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The tribunal ordered Italian Express Ltd to pay damages of £1,190 for that breach, payable within 14 days.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was therefore entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,190. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £297.50 for that sum, also within 14 days.
The judgment does not set out detailed reasons beyond those findings. An attached notice explains the tribunal's interest arrangements under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 and records the relevant decision day as 16 June 2020, but no separate interest figure is calculated in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages of £1,190. | Upheld | — | £1,190 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,190. | Upheld | — | £1,190 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and orders payment of £297.50. | Upheld | — | £298 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,678
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.