Case 2403435/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. J Ramos Ribeiro v Cibo Ltd (dissolved) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2403435/2022
- Decision date
- 25 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. J Ramos Ribeiro
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 26 June 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for having not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal also recorded that on 4 April 2024 the respondent, Cibo Ltd, was dissolved and no longer legally existed. It noted that unless steps were taken to restore the company to the register of companies, a claim could not be brought against it. In light of the lack of response and the respondent's dissolved status, the claim was struck out in its entirety.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying pleaded causes of action. It states that the claim in its entirety was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant made no sufficient representations in response to the Tribunal's letter of 26 June 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.