Case 2403440/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Tinton v Teresa Purdie — 2022
- Case reference
- 2403440/2022
- Decision date
- 17 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Tinton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 12 October 2022 before Employment Judge Horne, Miss C Tinton attended in person and Teresa Purdie did not attend; the respondent’s participation was restricted under rule 21. The tribunal upheld claims for an unauthorised deduction from holiday pay, breach of contract for failing to give notice of termination, redundancy payment, and unfair dismissal.
The tribunal ordered Teresa Purdie to pay £213.84 for the holiday pay deduction, £426.00 in damages for the notice breach, and £639.00 as a redundancy payment. The judgment stated that all awards were made gross.
On the unfair dismissal claim, the tribunal found that Miss C Tinton had been unfairly dismissed. It made no basic award because payment of the redundancy payment reduced it to zero, and the claimant withdrew her claim for any other remedy, so no further compensation was ordered.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of £213.84 for unauthorised deduction from holiday pay. All awards were made gross. | Upheld | — | £214 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a breach of contract for failure to give notice of termination and awarded £426.00 in damages. All awards were made gross. | Upheld | — | £426 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal held the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £639.00. This payment was later referred to when the tribunal explained why the basic award was reduced to zero. | Upheld | — | £639 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed. It made no basic award because payment of the redundancy payment reduced it to zero, and the claimant withdrew her claim for any other remedy. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,279
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.