Case 2403444/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Paul Fullarton v Renandco Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2403444/2023
- Decision date
- 17 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Paul Fullarton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in Mr Paul Fullarton v Renandco Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered it to pay £262.24. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £347.25.
The judgment does not set out further reasoning beyond those findings, and it does not identify any separate compensation categories such as basic award, compensatory award, or injury to feelings. The written record also includes the standard interest notice, stating that interest would be payable on unpaid sums in accordance with the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the award was not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day, but no separate interest amount is stated in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross/net sum of £262.24. | Upheld | — | £262 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment: the tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £347.25. | Upheld | — | £347 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £609
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.