Case 2403451/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Shiels v Promas Enterprises Limited t/a Lease4Less — 2021
- Case reference
- 2403451/2020
- Decision date
- 4 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Whittaker REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Shiels
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent in Case No. 2403451/2020 between Mr D Shiels and Promas Enterprises Limited t/a Lease4Less, heard at Manchester on 18 November 2020 before Employment Judge Whittaker. The Tribunal recorded that, by agreement, the claimant's claims were stayed on written terms agreed between the parties until 20 December 2020.
The judgment further provided that the claims would be dismissed on 20 December 2020 unless, before that date, either party wrote to the Tribunal seeking to lift the stay and provided comprehensive written reasons for any such application. The document does not record any substantive findings on liability or any remedy award.
The only outcome recorded in the judgment text is dismissal pursuant to the consent terms. No panel members are listed, and no money judgment was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment by consent. The claims were stayed on written terms agreed between the parties until 20 December 2020, and were to be dismissed on that date unless either party wrote to the Tribunal asking for the stay to be lifted with comprehensive written reasons. No merits determination or monetary award was recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.