Case 2403472/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs CA Maltzahn v Swifts Newsagents Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2403472/2022
- Decision date
- 20 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs CA Maltzahn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal proceeded under rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. On that basis, the Employment Judge determined the claim without a contested hearing and made findings on the papers.
The tribunal held that Mrs CA Maltzahn was dismissed in breach of contract because the respondent failed to give notice. It ordered Swifts Newsagents Limited to pay damages of £1,366.97 gross, calculated as 11 weeks' statutory notice at £124.27 per week.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and therefore was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment. It ordered payment of £2,050.46, calculated in the judgment as 11 complete years' service at 1.5 weeks for each year when the claimant was aged over 40, using the weekly figure of £124.27.
The written notice also records the tribunal's standard interest information under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, including a relevant decision day of 20 December 2022, a calculation day of 21 December 2022, and a stipulated rate of 8% per annum, but no separate interest figure is stated in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Failure to provide notice; tribunal awarded damages of 11 weeks at £124.27 per week, gross. | Upheld | — | £1,367 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found dismissal by reason of redundancy and awarded a statutory redundancy payment calculated as 11 x 1.5 x £124.27. | Upheld | — | £2,050 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,417
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 article 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.