Case 2403473/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr TJ Brown v HAP Recruitment Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2403473/2022
- Decision date
- 30 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr TJ Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 21 November 2022, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. It also recorded that the hearing fixed for 1 February 2023 would not take place. The extracted text does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying dispute, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing after the tribunal's letter dated 21 November 2022. The decision does not identify the substantive jurisdiction of the claim in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.