Case 2403487/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Simpson v JF Renshaw Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2403487/2023
- Decision date
- 9 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Simpson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 1 November 2023, the tribunal gave Mr Simpson an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated concern was that the claim appeared to be a duplicate of case number 2403449/2023, and that pursuing a duplicate claim after the original claim had been settled would amount to an abuse of process.
Mr Simpson did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Shotter therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying dispute and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive cause of action. The claim was struck out as a duplicate of case number 2403449/2023, and the tribunal said pursuit of a duplicate claim where the original claim had been settled constituted an abuse of process. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.