Case 2403488/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Warren v Allied London LLP UPON APPLICATION made by letter dated 7 September 2022 to reconsider the — 2022
- Case reference
- 2403488/2022
- Decision date
- 21 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bright
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Warren
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn an application by letter dated 7 September 2022, Employment Judge Bright reconsidered the judgment dated 23 August 2022 without a hearing. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had presented its response in time to the Manchester Employment Tribunal before receiving notification that the claim had been transferred to Leeds, but that due to an administrative error the response form was not matched to the file.
The judgment states that the Rule 21 judgment dated 23 August 2022 was revoked. No merits findings, compensation, or other substantive remedy are recorded in this reconsideration decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This was an application to reconsider the earlier Rule 21 judgment, not a substantive merits decision. The tribunal revoked the judgment dated 23 August 2022 because the respondent had presented its response in time to the Manchester Employment Tribunal, but an administrative error meant the response form was not matched to the file. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.