Case 2403490/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Murphy v Governing Body of Sutton Green Primary School — 2025
- Case reference
- 2403490/2024
- Decision date
- 28 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Murphy
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal reconsidered an earlier decision under rule 14(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal rules of procedure. It found that the decision to reject the part of the claim alleging that the respondent subjected the claimant to a detriment on the ground that he had made a protected disclosure was wrong.
The Tribunal also recorded that three complaints were dismissed on withdrawal: unauthorised deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, failure to provide a statement of employment particulars under section 1, and failure to provide an itemised pay statement under section 8. The written judgment does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the earlier decision to reject the part of the claim alleging detriment on the ground of a protected disclosure was wrong and was reconsidered under rule 14(1)(a). It does not determine the merits of that complaint in the written record. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unauthorised deduction from wages complaint contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The complaint of failure to provide a statement of employment particulars contrary to section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The complaint of failure to provide an itemised pay statement contrary to section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- rule 14(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal rules of procedure
- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.