Case 2403494/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Murauskaya v Coll Pay Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2403494/2024
- Decision date
- 18 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T Murauskaya
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mrs T Murauskaya against Coll Pay Ltd. It found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,039.57, found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £18,750, and found that the respondent had not paid accrued but untaken annual leave for 4 days, ordering £831.64.
The tribunal also held that the respondent failed to comply with regulation 13 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 and made an award of £5,600. The total award recorded in the judgment is £26,221.21.
The unfair dismissal claim was struck out. The judgment records that, according to the claim form, the claimant did not have the necessary two years' qualifying service, and that she was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim could proceed but did not respond. The interest notice stated that interest would be payable on awards if not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day, with the relevant decision day given as 18 October 2024 and the stipulated rate as 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,040 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Damages for notice; the judgment says the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £18,750 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but untaken annual leave entitlement of 4 days. | Upheld | — | £832 |
| Unfair dismissal | No award was made because the claim form stated the claimant did not have the necessary two years' qualifying service, and she did not respond to the invitation to make representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | Failure to comply with regulation 13 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006. | Upheld | — | £5,600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £26,221
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- regulation 13 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.