Case 2403498/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Allan v TSR Manchester Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2403498/2023
- Decision date
- 14 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Childe REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Allan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Childe, sitting at Manchester on 9 October 2024, heard the claims of Mr R Allan against TSR Manchester Limited (in voluntary liquidation). The claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The Tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages on 30 November 2022 and ordered payment of the £3,000 gross sum deducted, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance.
The Tribunal also found that the claimant had been unfairly dismissed and ordered the respondent to pay a basic award of £2,855 and a compensatory award of £17,878.56. The judgment records that these are the actual sums payable after any deductions or uplifts have been applied, and that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 do not apply.
The Tribunal found that the respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015 and that it was just and equitable to increase the compensatory award by 25% under s.207A TULR(C)A 1992. The Tribunal further found that the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars when proceedings began, with no exceptional circumstances making an award unjust or inequitable, and ordered payment of £571 (equivalent to four weeks' gross pay) under s.38 Employment Act 2002. Reasons were given orally; written reasons were not provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction made on 30 November 2022; gross sum of £3,000 ordered, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £3,000 |
| Unfair dismissal | Basic award of £2,855 and compensatory award of £17,878.56. Tribunal recorded that these are the actual sums payable after any deductions or uplifts have been applied, including a 25% uplift under s.207A TULR(C)A 1992 for unreasonable failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015. | Upheld | — | £20,734 |
| Other | Section 38 Employment Act 2002 award for breach of the duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars when proceedings began; award of an amount equal to four weeks' gross pay (£571). This is an ancillary statutory award rather than a free-standing §4.4 claim type, hence 'other'. | Upheld | — | £571 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £24,305
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,855
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £17,879
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.207A Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.