Case 2403501/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Nzeama v Your Nurse Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2403501/2020
- Decision date
- 22 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Nzeama
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mrs M Nzeama against Your Nurse Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,650.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had not paid accommodation costs due in breach of contract and ordered damages of £50. The judgment itself does not separate any wider remedy heads beyond those two sums.
A separate notice on interest was attached to the judgment. It states that interest would apply under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if sums remain unpaid after 14 days from the relevant decision day, and records 22 December 2020 as the relevant decision day, 23 December 2020 as the calculation day, and 8% as the stipulated rate, but it does not specify any interest amount in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,650 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £50 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,700
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.