Case 2403508/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss F Bennett v Urbanbubble Liverpool Limited (in Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2403508/2020
- Decision date
- 22 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss F Bennett
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent's response was struck out after the liquidator confirmed it was not being actively pursued, and the tribunal proceeded under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The claimant had tendered her resignation on 27 January 2020 and, under clause 9 of her contract, was required to give one month's notice. She started new employment on 27 February 2020. The tribunal found that she was dismissed without notice by the respondent on 20 February 2020, but that her employment would in any event have ended by operation of law on 26 February 2020.
The claimant succeeded in her claim for a statutory redundancy payment, which was assessed at £810.00 using one week at £405 gross weekly pay over two years. Her unfair dismissal claim also succeeded. The tribunal said it would have awarded a basic award of £810.00, but reduced that to nil under s.122(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 because the redundancy payment had already been awarded. It then awarded £500.00 for loss of statutory rights and no compensation for post-dismissal earnings.
The breach of contract claim succeeded because, had the contract not been breached, the claimant would have been paid for a further week until 26 February 2020. Damages were assessed at £351.25, being one week's net pay based on the gross weekly pay figure. The judgment states that the total payable by the respondent to the claimant was £1,661.25 and that the recoupment regulations did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment ordered at £810.00, calculated as 1 x per week x 2 years x £405 gross weekly pay. | Upheld | — | £810 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed without notice on 20 February 2020. It would have awarded a basic award of £810.00 but reduced that to nil under s.122(4) Employment Rights Act 1996 because of the redundancy payment already awarded. It awarded £500.00 for loss of statutory rights and no compensation for post-dismissal earnings. The judgment also states that employment would have ended by operation of law on 26 February 2020 in any event. | Upheld | — | £500 |
| Breach of contract | Damages were ordered for one week's net pay, based on gross weekly pay of £405.00, because the claimant would otherwise have been paid until 26 February 2020. | Upheld | — | £351 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,661
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.122(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.