Case 2403516/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Liberal v R B Logistic Solutions Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2403516/2020
- Decision date
- 11 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Liberal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 because the respondent had not presented a valid response within the prescribed time limit. On that basis, the claimant’s complaint for holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations succeeded. The tribunal found 7 days of accrued but untaken holiday at a daily rate of £96, and ordered payment of £672 gross.
The complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages also succeeded. The judgment listed deductions for the periods 11 November 2019 to 23 December 2019 and recorded both the wages due and the sums deducted as £2,200. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £2,200 gross.
The tribunal further found that the claimant had been dismissed without notice and was entitled to one week’s notice pay as damages for breach of contract. The award was £396 net, based on a weekly rate of £480 gross. The judgment included the usual notice about post-judgment interest if sums remain unpaid after 14 days, but no interest amount was quantified.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Holiday pay under regulation 14(2) or regulation 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal found 7 untaken but accrued days at a daily rate of £96 and ordered £672 gross. | Upheld | — | £672 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages for the periods listed in the judgment, totalling £2,200. The amount was ordered to be paid as a gross sum. | Upheld | — | £2,200 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed without notice and awarded one week's notice pay as damages for breach of contract. The award was £396 net, based on £480 gross per week. | Upheld | — | £396 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,268
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.