Case 2403519/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Smith v Philippa Wood t/a Bambinos — 2022
- Case reference
- 2403519/2022
- Decision date
- 24 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Liverpool on 21 October 2022, Employment Judge Horne upheld three monetary claims brought by Miss A Smith against Philippa Wood t/a Bambinos. The tribunal found that the respondent had made a series of unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £293.76.
The tribunal also found an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's holiday pay and ordered £220.32. In addition, it found that the respondent had breached the contract of employment by failing to give notice of termination and awarded damages of £146.88. The total amount payable was £660.96.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £294 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £220 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £147 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £661
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.