Case 2403534/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Laverty v D R Newitt Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2403534/2020
- Decision date
- 17 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Laverty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 17 August 2020, Employment Judge Batten entered a Rule 52 judgment in case 2403534/2020. The judgment records that the claimant's claim was dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No findings on the merits of the underlying dispute are set out in the judgment text.
The judgment also records that the employer's contract claim was dismissed following a withdrawal of the counterclaim by the claimant. There is no remedy award, no apportionment of compensation, and no legal test or substantive analysis recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the claim was dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant; the withdrawal judgment does not set out the substantive basis of the claim in the text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The employer's contract claim was dismissed following withdrawal of the counterclaim; no merits findings are recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.