Case 2403541/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss O Sohail v Radisson Hotel Manchester Limited t/a BLU Manchester Airport — 2020
- Case reference
- 2403541/2020
- Decision date
- 11 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss O Sohail
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss O Sohail's unfair dismissal complaint. It had first written on 19 June 2020 to give her an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that she lacked the necessary two years' qualifying service, or to request a hearing.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint.
The reasons record that the claimant's remaining claims were still listed for preliminary hearing on 14 October 2020. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint after giving the claimant an opportunity, by letter dated 19 June 2020, to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because she lacked the necessary two years' qualifying service. The claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.