Case 2403556/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Durksen v Signature Living Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2403556/2020
- Decision date
- 28 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Durksen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in Mr J Durksen's claim against Signature Living Ltd. Employment Judge Slater found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £543.65. No other substantive claim outcome or separate head of remedy is recorded in the judgment text provided.
The attached interest notice stated the relevant decision day as 28 August 2020, the calculation day as 29 August 2020, and the stipulated rate of interest as 8%. It explained that interest would be payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the sum remained unpaid after 14 days, but no separate interest figure is set out in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £543.65. | Upheld | — | £544 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £544
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.