Case 2403597/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Lee v Northwest One To One Care Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2403597/2020
- Decision date
- 3 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Lee
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a procedural judgment in which Employment Judge Phil Allen struck out the respondent's response. The tribunal had first written to the respondent on 28 July 2021 and gave it an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the response should not be struck out because the respondent had not complied with an order made after the hearing on 2 February 2021 and because the case had not been actively pursued.
The respondent did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the response.
The tribunal also recorded that the respondent would still be entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions, but would only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. The judgment does not determine the merits of the underlying discrimination or unfair dismissal claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is a procedural strike-out of the respondent's response. It does not determine the merits of any underlying employment claims. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.