Case 2403617/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N A Mayers v Elcarbec Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2403617/2024
- Decision date
- 6 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N A Mayers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On that basis, the tribunal made findings on the papers and did not record any contested hearing evidence in the judgment extract.
The tribunal found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. It awarded £414.48, made up of £288.00 of unpaid wages for 21 to 23 April 2024 at £96.00 per day, together with £126.48 of unpaid employee pension contributions for February to April 2024 at £42.16 per month.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's accrued untaken annual leave entitlement and ordered payment of £672.00, calculated as 7 days at £96.00 per day. It further found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £1,446.00, being 3 weeks' statutory notice at £482.00 per week, gross, to reflect the likelihood of tax being payable on that sum as Post Employment Notice Pay.
Finally, the tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,169.00, calculated at 1.5 weeks' pay for each full year worked over 3 years at £482.00 per week. The total gross sum awarded was £4,701.48. The judgment also included the standard interest notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating that the relevant decision day was 6 November 2024, the calculation day was 7 November 2024, and the stipulated rate was 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages. This sum comprised unpaid wages of £288.00 for 21-23 April 2024 and unpaid employee pension contributions of £126.48 for February to April 2024. | Upheld | — | £414 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid accrued untaken annual leave entitlement, calculated at £96.00 per day for 7 days. | Upheld | — | £672 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. Damages were calculated as 3 weeks' statutory notice at £482.00 per week, gross, to reflect likely tax treatment as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £1,446 |
| Redundancy | The claimant was found to have been dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded redundancy pay calculated at 1.5 weeks' pay for each full year worked (3 years) at £482.00 per week. | Upheld | — | £2,169 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,701
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, Article 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.