Case 2403634/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr James Tyrer v Options for Supported Living Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2403634/2022
- Decision date
- 13 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ficklin REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr James Tyrer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal, sitting at Manchester before Employment Judge Ficklin, considered Mr James Tyrer's claim against Options for Supported Living Ltd on 24 November 2022. The only claim identified in the judgment was unfair dismissal.
The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim because it was out of time. On that basis, the claim was dismissed.
The judgment notes that the hearing took place partly on a remote video platform and that neither party objected to that format. It also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested in writing within 14 days of the date the judgment was sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim because it was out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.