Case 2403653/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Vernon v Victorian Trading Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2403653/2023
- Decision date
- 15 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM ROSS
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Vernon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge KM Ross issued a Rule 21 judgment dated 11 September 2023, sent to the parties on 15 September 2023. The tribunal found that Miss E Vernon had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered Victorian Trading Limited to pay damages of £655.68, calculated using gross pay because the tribunal considered the claimant was likely to have to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The tribunal said the damages were calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the claimant would have to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £656 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent failed to pay the claimant's accrued untaken annual leave entitlement of 54.5 hours. | Upheld | — | £372 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,028
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.