Case 2403654/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss B S S Azariah v Beardsells Limited (in compulsory liquidation) and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2403654/2024
- Decision date
- 30 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss B S S Azariah
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal declared under sections 182 and 188(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 that the Secretary of State for Business & Trade ought to make a payment to the claimant of a basic award of compensation for unfair dismissal in the sum of £7,263.
The Tribunal also declared under sections 182 and 184(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 that the Secretary of State ought to make a payment to the claimant of notice pay in the sum of £1,525.68. The judgment records that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment declares that the Secretary of State ought to make a basic award of compensation for unfair dismissal. Written reasons were not provided in the text. | Upheld | — | £7,263 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment declares that the Secretary of State ought to make a payment of notice pay. Written reasons were not provided in the text. | Upheld | — | £1,526 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,789
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £7,263
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.