Case 2403716/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Hoofe v Link Paper Recycling Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2403716/2024
- Decision date
- 1 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Hoofe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined that a decision could properly be made under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On that basis the judge proceeded to determine the claimant's claims on the papers.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £2,070.00, calculated on gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the sum would be taxable as Post Employment Notice Pay. The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £3,881.25 (5 x £517.50 x 1.5), and that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's accrued but untaken holiday entitlement, ordering payment of £310.50 gross (3 days x £103.50).
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant a total of £6,261.75. A hearing previously listed for 7 January 2025 was cancelled. A statutory interest notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 was attached, identifying 1 November 2024 as the relevant decision day, 2 November 2024 as the calculation day, and the stipulated rate as 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice, calculated on gross pay to reflect likely tax treatment as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £2,070 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment calculated as 5 x £517.50 x 1.5. | Upheld | — | £3,881 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but untaken holiday entitlement: 3 days x £103.50 gross. | Upheld | — | £311 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,262
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, Article 12
- section 17 of the Judgments Act 1838
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.