Case 2403751/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Rowley v Park Holidays UK Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2403751/2024
- Decision date
- 13 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Rowley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 30 January 2025, the tribunal ordered Mr J Rowley to send a letter to the tribunal and the respondent stating the amount of money he was claiming for expenses and how that figure had been calculated. The order was limited to expenses he said he had incurred while working for Park Holidays UK Limited, which he said he had a contractual right to be paid, and excluded expenses incurred after dismissal or amounts that had only been paid late.
The claimant had previously been given opportunities to clarify his claim and was warned that failure to comply could result in strike-out. He did not comply with the order by 13 February 2025, so Employment Judge KM Ross struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive determination of liability and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not identify a separate merits determination; it says the claim was struck out after non-compliance with an order to clarify the amount claimed for expenses and how it was calculated. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.