Case 2403754/2024 · Employment Tribunal
M Cooney v Voltwave Group Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2403754/2024
- Decision date
- 28 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
M Cooney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 by Employment Judge Ross. The tribunal found that the respondent, Voltwave Group Limited, had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,458.33 together with £77.54 in unpaid pension.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £122.91. The hearing previously listed for 16 January 2025 was cancelled, and the total amount awarded to the claimant was £2,658.78.
A separate notice was issued under Article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, identifying 28 November 2024 as the relevant decision day, 29 November 2024 as the calculation day, and 8% per annum as the stipulated rate of interest.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal ordered gross sum of £2,458.33 plus £77.54 unpaid pension as unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £2,536 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay claimant's holiday entitlement; ordered to pay £122.91. Listed under Working Time Regulations on gov.uk. | Upheld | — | £123 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,659
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.