Case 2403923/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Dwan v Total Lift Care Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2403923/2022
- Decision date
- 14 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Dwan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in relation to commission due during 2021 in the gross sum of £500, salary for the period 1 to 20 February 2022 in the gross sum of £2,379.99, and damage to a company car in the gross sum of £400. It found that the claimant's employment terminated by reason of his resignation on 20 February 2022.
The remaining claims of unauthorised deductions from pay were dismissed. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had already paid the gross sum of £3,333.33 to the claimant and, applying section 25(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, made no order for the respondent to pay any further sum.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages of £500 in respect of commission due during 2021. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages of £2,379.99 in respect of salary for the period 1 to 20 February 2022, after the claimant resigned on 20 February 2022. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages of £400 in respect of damage to a company car in the claimant's possession. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The remaining claims of unauthorised deductions from pay were dismissed; the judgment does not break down those remaining items further. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.25(3) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.