Case 2403936/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Greaves v Classic Joinery Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2403936/2020
- Decision date
- 10 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Greaves
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment by Employment Judge Phil Allen in favour of Mr W Greaves against Classic Joinery Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,127 gross.
It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £3,455.60. Separately, the tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,080.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £691.12. The judgment directed that the sums due be paid within 14 days. The accompanying notice stated that unpaid sums would carry interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if not paid within that period, but no separate interest figure was quantified in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,127 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,127 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £3,455.60. | Upheld | — | £3,456 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £4,080. | Upheld | — | £4,080 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £691.12. | Upheld | — | £691 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,354
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.