Case 2403943/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss O. Renshaw v GovData Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2403943/2022
- Decision date
- 19 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss O. Renshaw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss O. Renshaw, succeeded on two money claims against GovData Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction of £149.65 net from the claimant’s wages paid in April 2022, and ordered payment of that sum to the claimant.
The tribunal also found the holiday pay complaint well founded. It held that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay the claimant for holiday accrued but not taken when her employment ended, and ordered payment of £1,373.12 net.
No separate basic award, compensatory award, or injury to feelings award was recorded. The written record includes an interest notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, but no separate interest figure is set out in the judgment itself. The total monetary award recorded in the judgment is £1,522.77 net.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction of £149.65 net from wages paid in April 2022. | Upheld | — | £150 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages because the respondent did not pay for holiday accrued but untaken when employment ended. | Upheld | — | £1,373 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,523
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.