Case 2403955/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Hughes v BLUEOAK Estates Limited Thomas Williams Peter Johnston Iain MacLean Stephen Roberts CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Under the provisions of — 2020
- Case reference
- 2403955/2020
- Decision date
- 25 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis document is a certificate of correction under rule 69, sent to the parties on 23 November 2020, correcting the first respondent's name from Bluecoat to BLUEOAK. It refers back to the judgment sent on 25 August 2020.
The underlying judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed against the second and third respondents, Thomas Williams and Peter Johnston, after the claimant withdrew all the claims against them. The claims remained live against BLUEOAK Estates Ltd, Iain MacLean and Stephen Roberts.
No liability findings, legal test, or monetary remedy are set out in the extracted text provided here, and no award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed against the second and third respondents after the claimant withdrew all claims against them. No substantive merits decision is recorded in this text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.