Case 2403958/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Jones v Bop & Bingo - The Tour Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2403958/2022
- Decision date
- 3 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr B Jones, brought a claim for unlawful deductions from wages against Bop & Bingo – The Tour Limited. The hearing took place remotely in Manchester on 2 November 2022 before Employment Judge K M Ross. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s claim under section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded and succeeded. No other claims are recorded in the judgment. The tribunal stated that the amount due was £1,967.29, calculated by reference to 207 hours 5 minutes at an hourly rate of £9.50.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay that sum within 14 days of the date of the judgment. The written notice also explained the tribunal’s interest arrangements, including that no interest would be payable if the sum was paid in full within 14 days after the written record of the decision was sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim well-founded under section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of £1,967.29, calculated as 207 hours 5 minutes at £9.50 per hour. | Upheld | — | £1,967 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,967
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.