Case 2403979/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Adeeko v Royal Haskoning DHV (Haskoning DHV UK Ltd) — 2018
- Case reference
- 2403979/2017
- Decision date
- 20 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Adeeko
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Ross at Manchester on 30 October 2018. The respondent applied to strike out the claim under rule 37(1)(b) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal rejected that application, finding that a fair trial was still possible.
The respondent's application for costs was stayed. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(b) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.