Case 2404024/2017 · Employment Tribunal
L Roberts v Logo Design Grp Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 2404024/2017
- Decision date
- 28 September 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Housego Representation
- Venue
- Plymouth
Parties
2 namedClaimant
L Roberts
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr L Roberts worked for the respondent for 30 years as a senior designer and was dismissed by the managing director on 9 May 2017 after a meeting in a pub. The tribunal found that the stated reason of redundancy was not the real reason and that the only reason for dismissal was his age. It also found that the respondent later advertised for someone to do the work he had been doing. The respondent did not attend the hearing, filed no response, and a preliminary hearing judgment had already been entered for the claimant on 24 May 2018, so the September 2018 hearing was a remedy hearing only.
For the dismissal-related awards, the tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to 12 weeks' notice but had only been paid for 8 weeks, so it ordered 4 weeks' notice pay of £2,269.24. It then made a basic award of £13,203, calculated on 27 weeks at the statutory maximum weekly amount of £489 because the claimant had 20 full years' service and 14 of those years counted at 1.5 weeks each. The compensatory award was £22,670.09, made up of £350 for loss of statutory industrial rights, £2,836.55 for five weeks without income after the notice period, £15,249.52 for one year's earnings loss, and a 25% uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code.
On age discrimination, the tribunal accepted that the dismissal had a substantial effect on the claimant. It awarded £15,000 for injury to feelings, describing the case as falling within the middle Vento band and taking account of the claimant's depressive vulnerability and the impact on him after dismissal. It also awarded £157,070.06 for loss of earnings and pension contributions, based on a continuing loss to retirement age after allowing for his new work at lower pay. The age discrimination award totalled £172,070.06, and the order records a total sum of £210,212.19.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Award of 4 weeks' notice pay. The judgment does not separately label this head as breach of contract or wrongful dismissal, but it is treated here as the notice pay award. | Upheld | — | £2,269 |
| Unfair dismissal | Basic award of £13,203 plus compensatory award of £22,670.09. | Upheld | — | £35,873 |
| Age discrimination | Includes £15,000 for injury to feelings and £157,070.06 for loss of earnings and pension contributions. | Upheld | Age | £172,070 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £210,212
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £13,203
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £22,670
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.86 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Vento mid band
- ACAS Code uplift
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.