Case 2404162/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Gillian Gaskell v Vale Restaurant Café Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2404162/2023
- Decision date
- 11 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cline
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Gillian Gaskell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Manchester by CVP on 4 October 2023, before Employment Judge Cline sitting alone, the parties were represented by the claimant in person and by Ms Carol Cheng for the respondent. The tribunal dealt with the claimant's claims for unauthorised deductions from wages, unauthorised deductions from holiday pay, and unauthorised deductions from pension contributions.
Each claim was recorded as well-founded by consent. The tribunal awarded the claimant £4,201.36 gross for unauthorised deductions from wages, £1,615.38 gross for unauthorised deductions from holiday pay, and £3,129.45 for unauthorised deductions from pension contributions.
The judgment directed that all outstanding sums were to be paid by 4pm on 11 October 2023. The written notice also set out the tribunal interest information under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, including that interest would not be payable if the sums were paid within 14 days after the written record was sent, and that the stipulated rate was 8% per annum if interest became payable.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent; the tribunal recorded the claim as well-founded and awarded the gross sum of £4,201.36. | Upheld | — | £4,201 |
| Holiday pay | By consent; the tribunal recorded the claim as well-founded and awarded the gross sum of £1,615.38. | Upheld | — | £1,615 |
| Other | By consent; the tribunal recorded a claim for unauthorised deductions from pension contributions as well-founded and awarded £3,129.45. The taxonomy has no specific pension-contributions category. | Upheld | — | £3,129 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,946
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.