Case 2404164/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Chloe Gaskell v Vale Restaurant Café Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2404164/2023
- Decision date
- 11 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cline
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Chloe Gaskell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat by CVP before Employment Judge Cline, sitting alone, and recorded the case as a consent judgment. It held that the claimant’s claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded and ordered Vale Restaurant Café Limited to pay the gross sum of £615.38, with the claimant responsible for any income tax or National Insurance due on that sum.
The tribunal also held that the claimant’s claim for unauthorised deductions from holiday pay was well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £475.70, again subject to the claimant’s responsibility for any income tax or National Insurance. The judgment directed that all outstanding sums be paid by 4 pm on 11 October 2023.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent; the tribunal recorded the claim as well-founded and ordered payment of the gross sum. | Upheld | — | £615 |
| Holiday pay | By consent; the tribunal recorded the claim as well-founded and ordered payment of the gross sum. | Upheld | — | £476 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,091
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.