Case 2404166/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Orchard v Cyanic Resources Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2404166/2023
- Decision date
- 16 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Orchard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Manchester on 7 May 2024, before Employment Judge Leach, the tribunal heard Mr Orchard’s case and the respondent did not attend. It found that Mr Orchard had been constructively dismissed and that the dismissal was unfair. The judgment awarded a basic award of £5,139 and a compensatory award of £26,349.45. In the annex, the basic award was calculated on 6 years’ continuous employment, age 55, and a capped week’s pay of £571; the compensatory award comprised 29 weeks’ loss at £742.05 a week, a further £4,330 for later loss of earnings, and £500 for loss of statutory rights.
The tribunal also upheld the notice pay claim as a breach of contract. It held that Mr Orchard was entitled to 6 weeks’ notice but did not receive it, and awarded £6,346.14 damages calculated on gross pay to reflect the likelihood of post-employment notice pay treatment.
Holiday pay was also found to be a well-founded claim. The tribunal held that there had been an unauthorised deduction from wages because 10 days of holiday had accrued but not been taken when the employment ended, and it awarded £2,115.38. The wages claim was likewise upheld: the tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages in the period 17 to 25 August 2022 and awarded £1,057.69, being the gross sum deducted. The total monetary award was £41,007.66. The written record contains an internal date inconsistency, because the main judgment states the dismissal date was 3 January 2024, while the annex refers to 3 January 2023 in the basic award calculation.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that Mr Orchard had been constructively dismissed and that the dismissal was unfair. The judgment awards a basic award of £5,139 and a compensatory award of £26,349.45. The written record contains an internal date inconsistency: the main judgment states the dismissal date was 3 January 2024, while the annex refers to 3 January 2023 in the basic award calculation. | Upheld | — | £26,349 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a well-founded breach of contract claim for notice pay. It held that Mr Orchard was entitled to 6 weeks' notice but did not receive it, and awarded £6,346.14 in damages calculated on gross pay to reflect likely post-employment notice pay treatment. | Upheld | — | £6,346 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of 10 days of holiday accrued but untaken at the end of employment. | Upheld | — | £2,115 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages in the period 17 to 25 August 2022 and awarded the gross sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £1,058 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £41,008
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £5,139
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £26,349
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.