Case 2404342/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Evans v CH Hydraulics Limited t/a Pirtek Ellesmereport — 2023
- Case reference
- 2404342/2023
- Decision date
- 3 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Evans
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Manchester on 28 September 2023 before Employment Judge Slater, the respondent did not attend and had presented no response. The tribunal recorded that it had jurisdiction to consider the complaint and that Mr Evans's complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was well founded.
The tribunal awarded £18,731 in total, made up of a basic award of £1,142 and a compensatory award of £17,589. The written record shows that the calculation used gross weekly pay of £673, net weekly pay of £508, a monthly bonus of £500 gross and £400 net, and minimum pension contributions of about £60 per month. It also recorded that Mr Evans's new employment began on 12 June 2023 at net weekly pay of £442.
In the compensatory award, the tribunal included past loss from 1 April 2023 to 11 June 2023, loss from 12 June 2023 to 28 September 2023, future loss for two years, loss of statutory rights, and job-hunting expenses. The judgment records a prescribed element of £8,828 for the period 1 April 2023 to 28 September 2023 and an excess over the prescribed element of £9,903, with the award subject to the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was well founded. The monetary award was not split by claim beyond the basic and compensatory elements of the unfair dismissal award. | Upheld | — | £18,731 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £18,731
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,142
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £17,589
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.