Case 2404391/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Oladipupo Sadare v Sterling Construction And Renewables Limited HELD AT: Manchester (by video over CVP) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2404391/2024
- Decision date
- 19 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Greer REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Oladipupo Sadare
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21. It found that the complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages and unpaid holiday pay were well-founded.
The judgment states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in April 2024 and failed to pay him for holidays accrued but not taken. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant a gross sum of £3,263.89, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Rule 21 judgment states that unauthorised deductions from wages were well-founded, but the single gross award is not split between wages and holiday pay. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The Rule 21 judgment states that unpaid holiday pay was well-founded, but the single gross award is not split between wages and holiday pay. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,264
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.