Case 2404401/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Wydra v Jana Durcikova — 2024
- Case reference
- 2404401/2023
- Decision date
- 23 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Wydra
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment, not a determination on the merits. By letter dated 24 January 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant's personal representatives an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The personal representatives did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The hearing fixed for 22 April 2024 to 24 April 2024 was vacated and did not take place.
The judgment does not identify any liability findings on the underlying employment claims, and it records no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not determine the underlying substantive claims individually. It records that, by letter dated 24 January 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant's personal representatives an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. No representations or hearing request were received, so the claim was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.