Case 2404403/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Loseby v Distrelec Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2404403/2023
- Decision date
- 8 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Loseby
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Johnson, sitting alone at Manchester by CVP on 3 November 2023, held that Mr R Loseby was not entitled to the retention bonus payment described in the respondent's letter dated 11 July 2022. On that basis, the tribunal found that the claimant's complaints of breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages were not well founded and the claim was unsuccessful.
The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the written record of the decision. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held the claimant was not entitled to payment of the retention bonus described in the respondent's letter dated 11 July 2022. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the claimant was not entitled to payment of the retention bonus described in the respondent's letter dated 11 July 2022. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.