Case 2404423/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Duffy v David Wood — 2023
- Case reference
- 2404423/2023
- Decision date
- 10 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Duffy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was determined under Rule 21 and the tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. The judgment records that the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant a gross sum of £610.
The amount was identified in the judgment as comprising £225 owed from arrears and £385 for 38.5 hours worked. No separate split of the award into different remedy heads was given.
The written record also included the standard interest notice, stating the relevant decision day as 10 October 2023, the calculation day as 11 October 2023, and the stipulated rate of interest as 8% per annum if the award remained unpaid after the initial 14-day period. No separate quantified interest sum was set out in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £610, described as £225 owed from arrears plus £385 for 38.5 hours worked. | Upheld | — | £610 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £610
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.