Case 2404432/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Stevenson v Dukinfield Engineering Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 2404432/2025
- Decision date
- 24 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Stevenson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 24 July 2026, Employment Judge Dunlop was satisfied that the claim had been served on Dukinfield Engineering Ltd and that the respondent had failed to respond within the specified period or at all. The respondent did not appear. Applying Rule 22(2), the judge determined the remaining complaints at the private preliminary hearing without listing a final hearing.
Mr Stevenson withdrew his complaints of disability discrimination and detriment on the grounds of protected disclosures. The tribunal dismissed both complaints upon withdrawal.
The tribunal found the wrongful dismissal complaint well-founded and awarded £4,615.38 gross for eight weeks' notice pay. It also upheld the unauthorised deductions from wages complaint, awarding £2,500 gross for unpaid salary for June 2025. The complaint concerning accrued outstanding holiday pay on termination succeeded, with an award of £923.08 gross for eight days.
The tribunal also found that Mr Stevenson was entitled to an unpaid redundancy payment of £6,923.04, calculated using eight years' service, an age factor of 1.5 and gross weekly wages of £576.92. The four separate awards add up to £14,961.50; the judgment does not expressly state a combined total. No interest amount was quantified. The accompanying notice specifies interest at 8% per annum from 30 July 2026, subject to the award being paid in full within 14 days after the written decision was sent on 29 July 2026.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | The complaint of detriment on the grounds of protected disclosures was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Gross award for eight weeks' unpaid notice pay. | Upheld | — | £4,615 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Gross award for one month's unpaid salary for June 2025. | Upheld | — | £2,500 |
| Holiday pay | Gross award for eight days' accrued outstanding holiday pay on termination. | Upheld | — | £923 |
| Redundancy | Calculated as eight years' service multiplied by an age factor of 1.5 and gross weekly wages of £576.92. | Upheld | — | £6,923 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,962
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22(2)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.